home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: shellx.best.com!usenet
- From: Rigor@clever.net (Matt Fox)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: 11/1/95 Courier flash value subtracted "upgrade"?
- Date: 22 Feb 1996 22:13:45 GMT
- Organization: Best Internet Communications
- Message-ID: <4gipqp$7b9@shellx.best.com>
- References: <4ghals$r93@news.xmission.com> <4ghnpu$6gb@firebrick.mindspring.com> <4gicu0$lqj@news.xmission.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: belvdere.vip.best.com
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7
-
- In article <4gicu0$lqj@news.xmission.com>, bmwright@xmission.com says...
- >
- >Floyd Drennon (fdrennon@mont.mindspring.com) wrote:
- >
- >: :>now? Why is the 11/5/95 flash so broken in the areas mentioned? It
- >: :>seems strange that no one else has noticed/mentioned this yet.
- >: :>
- >:
- >: Everything you mentione is an intentional engineering change per USR tech
- >: support. No reason was giving for the removal of the cellular
- capibilities.
- >:
- > This makes no sense. I would think that USR owes Dual Standard
- >owners some type of refund then. It wasn't long ago that I bought these
- >and they did cost more than a regular V.Everything. Now they've disabled
- >at least two of the features that I paid for and that are specifically
- >listed on the box/manual (%T touchtone decode and &L3 cellular mode). At
- >the same time they've GIVEN away HST to non Dual Standard owners while
- >just a couple months ago I had to pay extra for it. There is obviously
- >no extra hardware cost involved to them when implementing HST.
-
- just grab a copy of july flash code and reflash the modem
- instead touc tone decode and hst cellular
-
-
-